Everything You Need to
Understand & Use Octagem
Tools, guides, research papers, and visual assets—all freely available to accelerate carbon market integrity.
Downloads
Free tools and documentation for the Octagem Framework
Complete methodology guide with scoring rubrics for all 8 dimensions
Excel template for calculating Octagem scores for your carbon projects
Logo, octagem graphics, and brand assets for Octagem Framework
15 detailed carbon project evaluations with Octagem scores
Peer-reviewed research on Octagem Framework development and validation
PowerPoint template for introducing Octagem to stakeholders
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about the Octagem Framework
Yes. The methodology is freely available under Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0. Anyone can use, adapt, and build upon Octagem, with attribution.
Verra and Gold Standard are registries that certify carbon projects meet baseline standards. Octagem is a quality rating system that evaluates those certified projects—like how S&P rates corporate bonds. Think: Verra/Gold Standard = FDA approval, Octagem = Consumer Reports rating.
Currently self-funded. We are pursuing grants from climate foundations and potentially a consortium model where large carbon buyers collectively fund independent evaluation.
Yes! Download our scoring worksheet and follow the rubric. For independent third-party verification, contact us about assessment services.
We welcome challenges. Submit evidence through our appeals process (see Framework Guide). We will publicly document all score revisions with reasoning.
Not yet, but it is on our roadmap. We are building a public database with API access for verified Octagem scores. Expected launch: Q3 2025.
We do not accept funding from project developers or carbon brokers. Scores are determined by a committee of 3+ evaluators with disclosed expertise. All methodology changes go through public comment periods.
Projects can request re-evaluation annually or when major changes occur (new monitoring tech, expanded permanence guarantees, etc.). We track score evolution over time.
Latest Insights
Research, analysis, and updates from the Octagem team
The $2 billion carbon credit market has a quality problem. Here is how Octagem brings clarity to carbon.
Three independent proofs converge on 8 as the optimal number of quality dimensions for carbon credits.
Deep dive into a high-quality REDD+ project and what separates it from lower-scoring alternatives.
Why we weighted Social Impact at 1.5x and how it changes carbon project evaluation.
Media Kit
Press releases, logos, octagem graphics, and brand guidelines for journalists and partners
Logos & brand assets
One-page Octagem overview
Media inquiries
Get monthly updates on new case studies, framework improvements, and carbon market insights
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We respect your privacy.
Octagem API
Integrate Octagem scores directly into your carbon marketplace, portfolio tracker, or ESG dashboard
GET https://api.carbonoctagem.org/v1/projects/VCS-1234
{
"project_id": "VCS-1234",
"name": "Amazon REDD+ Conservation",
"c8_score": 78,
"c8_grade": "AAA",
"scores": { ... },
"last_updated": "2025-03-15"
}